Data-Driven Compilation of LFG Semantic Forms
نویسنده
چکیده
In a recent paper (van Genabith et al., 1999) describe a semi-automatic method for annotating tree banks with high level Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) f-structure representations. First, a CF-PSG is automatically induced from the tree bank using the method described in (Charniak, 1996). The CF-PSG is then manually annotated with functional schemata. The resulting LFG is then used to deterministically \reparse" the original tree bank representations simply following the c-structure deened by the original annotations, thereby inducing f-structures corresponding to the original c-structures. The annotated grammars, however, are not yet stand-alone LFGs. They cannot be used to analyse freely occurring strings as opposed to strings annotated with c-structures as in the original tree bank. What is missing is the LFG account of subcategorization in terms of semantic forms and completeness and coherence constraints. In the present paper we develop automatic and semi-automatic methods for compiling LFG semantic forms from the tree banks annotated with f-structure representations , eeectively turning the grammars developed in the original approach into stand-alone LFG grammars. In addition, the method provides full semantic forms as PRED values for the f-structures obtained from the input tree bank.
منابع مشابه
Type-driven semantic interpretation and feature dependencies in R-LFG
This paper describes a new formalization of Lexical-Functional Grammar called R-LFG (where the “R” stands for “Resource-based”). The formal details of R-LFG are presented in Johnson (1997); the present work concentrates on motivating R-LFG and explaining to linguists how it differs from the “classical” LFG framework presented in Kaplan and Bresnan (1982). This work is largely a reaction to the ...
متن کاملSmall CCC’s as Logical Forms for LFG Glue Semantics
In this brief note I will present a way to adapt the ‘semantic interpretation as a functor’ idea introduced independently but in similar forms by Lambek (1988) and Dougherty (1993) for Categorial Grammar to the rather different environment of LFG glue semantics’ (Dalrymple (2001), Asudeh (2004) and many other works). Pollard Pollard (2004) presents a somewhat different conception of semantic in...
متن کاملProof-nets as Logical Forms for LFG
Although ‘glue semantics’ appears to be generally accepted as LFG’s present account of semantic composition, its uptake amongst LFG practitioners doesn’t actually seem to be that extensive (and a number of well-known syntacticians have claimed to me that they are pretty much baffled by it). A possible reason for this is that the standard presentation of glue is based on term-assigning deduction...
متن کاملTransforming Dependency Structures to Logical Forms for Semantic Parsing
The strongly typed syntax of grammar formalisms such as CCG, TAG, LFG and HPSG offers a synchronous framework for deriving syntactic structures and semantic logical forms. In contrast—partly due to the lack of a strong type system—dependency structures are easy to annotate and have become a widely used form of syntactic analysis for many languages. However, the lack of a type system makes a for...
متن کاملInput and Glue in OT-LFG
In glue logic (Dalrymple 1999, 2001, Asudeh 2004), LFG has found a reasonably stable but developing method for connecting syntactic structures to formal semantic intepretation. However current formulations of glue logic make the rather unsatisfactory move of divorcing grammatical features from any intrinsic connection with what are usually regarded as their meanings. Rather than directly connec...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007